Answer:
Given the fact that, according to the Bible, Adam was created on the
sixth day of our planet’s existence, we can determine a biblically
based, approximate age for the earth by looking at the chronological
details of the human race. This assumes that the Genesis account is
accurate, that the six days of creation were literal 24-hour periods,
and that there were no ambiguous gaps in the chronology of Genesis.
The genealogies listed in Genesis chapters 5 and 11 provide the age at
which Adam and his descendants each fathered the next generation in a
successive ancestral line from Adam to Abraham. By determining where
Abraham fits into history chronologically and adding up the ages
provided in Genesis 5 and 11, it becomes apparent that the Bible teaches
the earth to be about 6000 years old, give or take a few hundred years.
What about the billions of years accepted by most scientists today and
taught in the vast majority of our academic institutions? This age is
primarily derived from two dating techniques: radiometric dating and the
geologic timescale. Scientists who advocate the younger age of about
6000 years insist that radiometric dating is flawed in that it is
founded upon a series of faulty assumptions, while the geologic
timescale is flawed in that it employs circular reasoning. Moreover,
they point to the debunking of old-earth myths, like the popular
misconception that it takes long periods of time for stratification,
fossilization and the formation of diamonds, coal, oil, stalactites,
stalagmites, etc, to occur. Finally, young-earth advocates present
positive evidence for a young age for the earth in place of the
old-earth evidences which they debunk. Young-earth scientists
acknowledge that they are in the minority today but insist that their
ranks will swell over time as more and more scientists reexamine the
evidence and take a closer look at the currently accepted old-earth
paradigm.
Ultimately, the age of the earth cannot be proven. Whether 6000 years or
billions of years, both viewpoints (and everything in between) rest on
faith and assumptions. Those who hold to billions of years trust that
methods such as radiometric dating are reliable and that nothing has
occurred in history that may have disrupted the normal decay of
radio-isotopes. Those who hold to 6000 years trust that the Bible is
true and that other factors explain the “apparent” age of the earth,
such as the global flood, or God’s creating the universe in a state that
“appears” to give it a very long age. As an example, God created Adam
and Eve as fully-grown adult human beings. If a doctor had examined Adam
and Eve on the day of their creation, the doctor would have estimated
their age at 20 years (or whatever age they appeared to be) when, in
fact, Adam and Eve were less than one day old. Whatever the case, there
is always good reason to trust the Word of God over the words of
atheistic scientists with an evolutionary agenda.
No comments:
Post a Comment